This blog attitudinize a novice in the cosmology of Systemism and specifically the system's paradigmatic shifts. What follows are speculations which I think you should all (members of the swarm) pose to.

Monday, August 28, 2006

Due Date sooner than expected !

Ninja!

Seen before...but not in a Rhizomatic context !

Rhizometect thinks you've seen this before, but curious enough to shed light upon in this post-systemic blog.

Saturday, August 26, 2006

Just some infos to note for !

Hello writerly active readers of the current blog, Rhizometect came by this piece of information and thought of passing it to you waiting your active feedbacks and comments, hence speculations.
Click on Copyright image below to view content.

Thursday, August 24, 2006

A Rhizometect's perception of the MiddleEast Paradox !

This movie epitomizes a Rhizometect's perception of a whole new yet old Middle Eastern crisis, which seems now a paradox to him (remember Zeno's paradoxes)
Rhizometect needs you all, active writerly readers(passive readers are discarded) to comment whether in this blogspot or in the original location of the movie.

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

Russian Refuses Highest Math Honor !

I have to confess my failing in a "solitudeness" of utter academic work. However the content here is one for architects as salt is for the Mediterranean.(Click here to read the full article in context)
Just to summarize, it is all an issue of "topological admiration". This being endorsed Topology so much as to leave behind a Fields Medal and a $1 million.
Hmm...will any architect be such a boaster one day and leave behind The Pritzker Architecture Prize? Maybe a rhizometect might.

Monday, August 21, 2006

Wednesday, August 16, 2006

Acephalous peace => No Procrastination => Snr. Pr. Due Date

It hase always been as such, an "Acephalous" seize fire, or to call it "Acephalous Peace".
This issue, nevertheless, entails me to banish procrastination in favor of wraping up my Senior Project.
Yes, I say it once more, there is no time to spare on additional though fertile extensive research any more. What they only did was cutting the lizard's tail (and they thought it was the snake's head"s" instead).

Anyway, in the coming weeks I'll be working extensively on my senior project so I'll be hardpressed to afford any time to update you fellow attendants of an Acephalous blog of mine.


By the way, I found this image in Wikipedia encyclopedia website, and I need you to
speculate on it a bit. I'll be giving you its description soon.


Now it seems the time to paste the image with explanation(picture to the right)

Sunday, August 13, 2006

Rhizometect say: "Scrutinize Ditto"

" we don't care neither to clean shoes nor to wax boats, we can only tell you to: "F <> <> <> OFF "
To "peruse" on the above, read profoundly what was written in this blogspot on Saturday, July 22, 2006. Click here

You can read this in this current present, yesteryears, or in the years to come; because it's spatio-temporal,i.e. its purport changes with the commutation of space interdependent on a specific time whether in the past, present or future.

Tuesday, August 08, 2006

farewell to procrastination...farewell to the semantics of war !

farewell to procrastination...farewell to the semantics of war !
Or should I say, Farewell to the semantics of peace and war. I don't know as I am concerned, but those of you out there defninitely know something. I believe you know a slight thing about an "Airline Bomb Plot", then why shouldn't you know anything about "a farewell to war and peace" !
Ofcourse I am more than ever now eager to witness a Middle East whereby we come to have a unified dictionary demystifying an abrupt use of the terms Peace and War not as antonyms but as synonyms. Yes, I am attesting an embryology of a Middle Eastern Dictionary whose terms of peace and war are not opposite anymore. In fact this new dictionary comprise only the two terms: peace and war.

Saturday, August 05, 2006

Who we really are: From the (N-1) to the Nth

"We are already in space, in a space-time of (n-1) dimensions; but we are on the verge of achieving the Nth dimension, whereby we not only add locomotives and exploit our organs, but we manipulate the basic generative genes that would ultimately lead to both a survival and a destruction of the "feeble". "

By Rhizometect



Friday, August 04, 2006

Post-Script: Socio-politico-Gravitational speculations !

I will not speculate much on the current lebanese/Israeli balance of a socio-political cosmology that is on the verge of "disoder" (yet I hope this "disorder" is "complexified").
I will only leave you, for the space-time being, with this analogy b/w a well-ordered balanced cosmology and a disordered complex yet balanced mundane.

According to me, Rhizometect, it seems that all curent socio-political issue elucidates Issac Newton's gravitational hypothesis but in an opposite inverse scenario.

In other terms, Issac Newton observed apples falling from the tree then he deduced, of course after much mathematical experimentation, that "gravity" is the perpetrator.
Now what is happening, or at least what is going to happen, is the inverse of Newton's hypothesis. "They" are appropriating the term "gravity" then they wait and observe the apple tree (even though they know what is next).
Oll Korrect only if apples do fall down vertically (or at least as they hope so).
But what if apples flew up?
What if apples never came to fall at all?
But by the time we intuit this, the term "gravity" would have been resided and changing and replacing it by another identification might be and should be perverse.

I won't be able now to explain profoundly my speculations (due to the fact that the internet is nowadays vulnerable to blackHoles that are emulsifying the world wide web's "self-determination"). But if such speculation is scientifically feasable, then its feasability intensify also in a "socio-politico-gravitational" comsmological conflict per se.

Hawking Says Space Colonies Needed...I think he's right

The great man's answer to the question of human survival: Er, I don't know

· Hawking's conundrum draws 25,000 responses
· Best bet, he says, may be to go into outer space


Ian Sample, science correspondent
Thursday August 3, 2006
The Guardian


It was an unusual move for one of the world's most eminent scientists. Having built a career shedding light on the darkest secrets of the universe, from the essence of space-time to the complexity of black holes, Professor Stephen Hawking turned to the internet for answers to the latest conundrum occupying his planet-sized brain.

Introducing himself to the online community as a theoretical physicist and Lucasian professor of mathematics at the University of Cambridge, the 64-year-old scientist posed an open question: "In a world that is in chaos politically, socially and environmentally, how can the human race sustain another 100 years?"

The question appeared on the website Yahoo Answers a month ago, immediately stirring up an internet storm that saw more than 25,000 people log on to give their deeply-considered views: some said we should just learn to get along, others predicted technology would see us through, and more still invoked the powers of God, love and peace.

But what the world wanted most of all was to hear the great scientist answer his own question, an intervention, most were convinced, that would amount to nothing less than a definitive treatise for human survival. Yesterday, the professor's response finally arrived. In a videoclip submission, the familiar electronic voice pronounced: "I don't know the answer. That is why I asked the question."

Signs of disappointment were muted yesterday, with one respondent choosing to applaud the scientist's honesty. "It is humbling to know that this question was asked by one of the most intelligent humans on the planet ... without already knowing a clear answer," wrote Inetap.

Others took a more encompassing view of life, concluding that humans had had a good innings and it was time to hand over the planet, albeit in a shabby state, to a new caretaker species to see if they could do better. "Maybe the human race shouldn't survive. Let other life forms flourish. We suck," said Video_stooge.

But Prof Hawking's frank admission that even he was stumped by the question merely opened a lengthy response. In a four-minute recorded reply, he laid out a beginner's guide to the changing face of threats to mankind, from devastating asteroid impact and nuclear war to climate change and rampaging genetically modified viruses.

In the long term, Prof Hawking says, humans will only survive if they can leave the rock they call home and spread out into space, to transform and occupy planets around our own sun and then around other suns. Failing that, he adds, perhaps our best bet is to use genetic engineering to tinker with the human species and make us less prone to fighting war.

The reply has now joined the multitude of responses from others who tried to answer the original question, among them succinct advice for us all to eat more fruit and veg, fledgling plans to live underwater, and functional advice to keep eating, breathing and having sex.

But Prof Hawking's message cut the online community into broad camps, populated by optimists, religious groups, climate change deniers and fellow doom-mongers. Rabbit, one poster, believed that despite war, climate change and a breathtaking acceleration of new technology, humankind was not about to annihilate itself. "It will work out ... There will undoubtedly be problems and disasters, but nothing so devastating to match your pessimism. Lighten up!"

The scientist's personal favourite answer came from the fittingly monikered Semi-Mad Scientist. "Without the belief that we will continue to grow and overcome the pains of social chaos as we mature as a species, we might as well not have any faith at all. I'm not talking religion ... but simply the same belief that we will survive just as much as the sun will rise the next day," he said.



Hawking Says Space Colonies Needed
By SYLVIA HUI
The Associated Press
Tuesday, June 13, 2006; 1:42 PM

HONG KONG -- The survival of the human race depends on its ability to find new homes elsewhere in the universe because there's an increasing risk that a disaster will destroy the Earth, world-renowned astrophysicist Stephen Hawking said Tuesday.
Humans could have a permanent base on the moon in 20 years and a colony on Mars in the next 40 years, the British scientist told a news conference.

"We won't find anywhere as nice as Earth unless we go to another star system," added Hawking, who arrived in Hong Kong to a rock star's welcome Monday. Tickets for his lecture planned for Wednesday were sold out.

He added that if humans can avoid killing themselves in the next 100 years, they should have space settlements that can continue without support from Earth.
"It is important for the human race to spread out into space for the survival of the species," Hawking said. "Life on Earth is at the ever-increasing risk of being wiped out by a disaster, such as sudden global warming, nuclear war, a genetically engineered virus or other dangers we have not yet thought of."

The 64-year-old scientist _ author of the global best seller "A Brief History of Time" _ is wheelchair-bound and communicates with the help of a computer because he suffers from a neurological disorder called amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or ALS.
Hawking said he's teaming up with his daughter to write a children's book about the universe, aimed at the same age group as the Harry Potter books.

"It is a story for children, which explains the wonders of the universe," said his daughter, Lucy, a journalist and novelist. They didn't provide other details.

Quotations from Hawking...

I have noticed even people who claim everything is predestined, and that we can do nothing to change it, look before they cross the road.
- Stephen Hawking

Wednesday, August 02, 2006

Could you speculate on that !

A close cyberfriend of mine (although I have no other one) lately told me the following:

"...if you have arms, and you don't use them, then you don't really need them...but if you show you need to use them, then you get more...it is complicated..."

The above quotation is in context of the current Middle East crisis. In other words, according to my cyberfriend (who, by the way, is a well-literate person in foreign policies and a researcher in Middle Eastern studies), it represents the main direct yet complex whole perception of the current crisis.
I won't add more but I leave you to speculate on it (which I will be doing the same right now).