a Nomad says:What if the Roman Brittania has this safety b-box with it's rival keeper, BbS..
What if Cyrus II empire is and shall reach obliteration? and by whose authorities? the 51st gate city.. but hey, they might need it. IF Cyrus II knew of his empire's atrocities, then he would have asked for that himself..
What if MEbcD was to be nuked down to its 7th layers, claiming it's the meteorite who did all that ( and what meteorite we're talking about? who's maneuvering it? what launcher ;) ..
What CUNTS !!! STUPID IMBECILES!!!
It's quite a disparaging act to think for a while that THEY do care. I don't care, then why should they?
Integrity my fellow members of the swarm, here where it all sums up. Integrity.
We are asked to obey "norms", standards "they" think might be satisfactory to the development of thinking.. yet what are those norms? let's consider norms in architecture, many come to "vitruvianize" architecture. Why do i care if a certain door is 80 or 90 cm, whereby the thing i need most is to pass from a certain space to another. Why do windows need to be 1 m levitated from the finished floor level.. well this is the case "those proclaiming to be architects "think in Lebanon and the whole "ME" as not to blame the Lebanese solely for that idiosyncratic act (it's turning into a Neufertian move of affects).
And some try to "vitruvianize" politics, even they try to "vitruvianize" social values, socio-political and socio-geographical facts.. isn't it not what BbS wants from his last act of the play?
Nomad concludes that it seems it's time to change those norms, rather to obliterate them. It's time to dictate the new neo-norms, the new values of perception, of cognition. After all knowledge is not innate, but rather accreted (isn't it what edgar le Moigne painstakingly worked on to negate descartes' old epistemological knowledge?)
No comments:
Post a Comment